Showing posts with label polling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label polling. Show all posts

Monday, November 8, 2010

Cliffhanger as swing against Victorian Labor looms


VICTORIA could be heading for another cliffhanger election. A swing against Labor on election day of just 3.7 per cent would be enough to force it into a minority government, relying on the Greens for support.

With opinion polls reporting swings of between 1.5 and 3.5 per cent to the Coalition, for the first time since Steve Bracks dethroned Jeff Kennett in 1999, Victorians are entering an election in which there is a real chance that Labor could lose its majority or even lose government.

In 2006, with Bracks still at the helm, Labor won 43 per cent of first preference votes, and 54.4 per cent of all votes after preferences. The Liberals and Nationals under Ted Baillieu actually won a swing of 3.4 per cent, but with Labor retaining 55 of the 88 seats in the House, it seemed nothing had changed.

This time a swing of about that size would mean real change. But the Coalition needs a swing of almost twice that size 6.5 per cent to win government in its own right.

If the swing is too large for Labor to retain its majority, but too small for the Coalition to win a majority, Victoria, like Australia, would have a minority government, with new Greens MPs joining independent Craig Ingram in holding the balance of power.

Most assume this would result in some form of Labor-Greens coalition but no one has yet ruled anything in or out.

In the Legislative Council, where the Greens already hold the balance of power, the odds are that they will retain it with expanded numbers, probably taking the DLP's seat in Western Victoria and maybe a Liberal seat in the eastern suburbs.

But let's look first at the seats on the front line of this election. As a rule, the party that holds the outer eastern suburbs of Melbourne forms government. Labor broke the rule in 1999, when, with three independents, it won half the seats in regional Victoria. But in 2010 it will have to hold most of those eastern suburban marginals to hold power.

Mount Waverley was retained by Labor's Maxine Morand last time by just 0.4 per cent. In neighbouring Forest Hill, former Olympic ski champion Kirstie Marshall held her seat by just 0.8 per cent.

Mitcham is Labor's by just 2 per cent, Burwood (Jeff Kennett's old seat) by 3.8 per cent, and in the distant Dandenongs Gembrook by 0.8 per cent.

These five seats are must-wins for the Coalition if it is to win government. Gembrook aside, they are middle-class, middle-suburban seats, whose voters are better off than most, and normally would be expected to go with the Liberals.

To the city's south are inner suburban Prahran (3.6 per cent), bayside Mordialloc (3.6) and outer suburban Frankston (3.3). And in Geelong's southern suburbs, there's South Barwon (2.3).

Winning these nine seats would not be enough to put the Coalition into power, but it would be a start. Most are traditional Liberal seats. If it doesn't win most of them, it is hard to see it winning government.

Its problem is that the next swag of seats those it needs to win power require much bigger swings: 6 to 9 per cent. And many are in Geelong, Ballarat and Bendigo, which have been solid Labor territory in recent elections not least, at the 2010 federal election.

Labor now holds all four seats in Geelong, and to win back Bellarine (8.0) or Geelong (8.4) is a big ask. Ballarat East (6.7) and Ballarat West (6.6) are equally tough, when Labor won 61.7 per cent of the Ballarat vote in the federal election. And while Industry Minister Jacinta Allan holds Bendigo East by a less daunting 5.4 per cent, Labor lifted its federal vote there to almost 60 per cent. The federal election, however, experienced swings against Labor in the more rural seats. But Agriculture Minister Joe Helper is alone on the front line, in Ripon (4.4) around Ararat.

Seymour (6.7) and Macedon (8.2) sound like natural Liberal seats, but their names are misleading. Half the Labor vote in Macedon is actually in Sunbury, and in Seymour, most of its vote is in townships on Melbourne's outer fringe, such as Healesville, Wallan and Kilmore. If Black Saturday costs Labor any seats, Seymour should be it.

But to win government, the Liberals will have to win some of the hard-asks in Melbourne's middle and outer suburbs: Bentleigh (6.4), Eltham (6.5), Monbulk (6.7), Carrum (6.8) and Yan Yean (8.0). The first four are the kind of seats that change when governments change. If they don't go Liberal, Victoria won't either.

The Nationals are not part of this contest. They are contesting only four seats they don't hold already, and only in Craig Ingram's seat of Gippsland East (8.5) do they have a realistic chance if they beat the Liberals into third place.

But there is a quite different battleground that many will focus on. After taking the federal seat of Melbourne off Labor in August, the Greens have set their sights on four state seats in the inner suburbs: Melbourne (where they need a swing of just 2.1 per cent), Brunswick and Richmond (both 3.7) and Northcote (8.6).

On federal voting, they would win Melbourne and Richmond easily, but just miss out on Brunswick and Northcote. If the latest polls are right, and Liberal preferences go their way, they will win all four. If so, the Liberals would have to win just seven seats from Labor to force it into minority government while a 10-seat shift to the Coalition would put it in the driver's seat to negotiate a minority government.

But while one poll put the Greens support as high as 19 per cent, it is hard to see any other realistic chances for them.

At this election, Ted Baillieu will be swimming uphill. Governments normally win elections. The Coalition has never led in the polls. The Greens are natural Labor allies. And the Coalition needs a landslide to win. And yet, this could be close.

STATE OF

THE PARTIES

LABOR 55

LIBERAL 23

NATIONAL 9

INDEPENDENT 1

SWING TO LABOR PARTY

SWING TO LIBERAL AND NATIONAL PARTIES

Source: Victorian Electoral Commission. Figures show two-party swings needed to change seats between Labor

and Coalition, except in seats marked (*G) where the swing shown is between Labor and the Greens.

In Gippsland East, the Liberals would need a swing of 9.2 per cent to unseat Craig Ingram.

TWO-PARTY VOTE IN 2006

Labor 54.4%

Liberals-Nationals 45.6%

Swing to Coalition 3.4%

FIRST PREFERENCES 2006:

Labor 43.1 %, Liberal 34.4 ,

Nationals 5.2 (Coalition 39.6),

Greens 10.0, Family First 4.3,

independents and others 3.0.

to end Labors majority, Coalition

and Greens need to gain a net 11

seats (3.7% swing).

to win majority of their own,

Coalition parties need to gain a

net 13 seats (6.5% swing).

to win majority of its own,

Liberals need to gain a net 22

seats (8.4% swing).

LABOR SEATS

Percentage swing

needed to lose seat

SAFE SEATS

31.9% Broadmeadows

31.1% Thomastown

25.6% Kororoit

25.4% Preston

24.7% Footscray

24.3% Derrimut

24.3% Williamstown

22.8% Pascoe Vale

21.5% Lyndhurst

20.8% Mill Park

20.3% Clayton

20.3% Altona

20.2% Yuroke

19.4% Keilor

18.7% Dandenong

18.0% Lara

15.8% Mulgrave

15.2% Bundoora

13.6% Melton

12.5% Tarneit

12.4% Oakleigh

11.8% Essendon

11.3% Cranbourne

11.2% Niddrie

11.0% Narre Warren Sth

10.6% Bendigo West

10.5% Ivanhoe

NORMALLY SAFE SEATS

9.7% Albert Park

9.3% Narre Warren North

8.6% Northcote (*G)

8.4% Geelong

8.2% Macedon

8.0% Bellarine

8.0% Yan Yean

6.8% Carrum

6.7% Monbulk

6.7% Seymour

6.7% Ballarat East

6.6% Ballarat West

6.5% Eltham

6.4% Bentleigh

LIBERAL-NP SEATS

Percentage swing

needed to lose

SAFE SEATS

Rodney (Nat) 24.9%

Shepparton (Nat) 24.7%

Swan Hill (Nat) 23.4%

Lowan (Nat) 22.1%

Murray Valley (Nat 21.8%

Mildura (Nat) 20.7%

Benalla (Nat) 17.6%

Gippsland South (Nat) 15.9%

Hawthorn 12.3%

Mornington 11.9%

Malvern 11.4%

Scoresby 11.2%

Brighton 11.0%

Polwarth 10.7%

NORMALLY SAFE SEATS

Kew 9.6%

Nepean 9.4%

Warrandyte 9.0%

Sandringham 8.7%

Bulleen 8.5%

Doncaster 8.2%

Benambra 7.8%

Caulfield 7.7%

MARGINAL SEATS

Bass 5.6%

Box Hill 5.3%

South West Coast 4.1%

Bayswater 2.9%

Evelyn 2.8%

Narracan 2.7%

Morwell (Nat) 2.2%

Hastings 1.0%

Kilsyth 0.4%

Ferntree Gully 0.1

0.4% Mount Waverley

0.8% Gembrook

0.8% Forest Hill

2.0% Mitcham

2.1% Melbourne (*G)

2.3% South Barwon

3.3% Frankston

3.6% Mordialloc

3.6% Prahran

3.7% Brunswick (*G)

3.7% Richmond (*G)

3.8% Burwood

4.4% Ripon

5.4% Bendigo East



Read more >>

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Poll points to possible hung Victorian parliament


A NEW poll has put the Coalition on level pegging with the Brumby government, suggesting Victoria too could have a hung parliament and minority government after November 27.

The Essential Research online poll, taken over September and October among 1465 voters, reports the Coalition holding a six-point lead over Labor on first preferences, with 44 per cent to Labor's 38 per cent.

The poll reported the Greens vote as 12 per cent. After preferences, the poll found Labor and the Coalition in a dead heat, each with 50 per cent of the two-party vote. If Victorians were to vote that way, Labor would likely lose its majority in the Legislative Assembly, giving the Greens the balance of power and the ability to decide which side would form the government.

On a uniform swing, the Coalition would stand to win 10 seats and the Greens three. Labor and the Coalition would have 42 seats each, with the Greens and independent Craig Ingram holding the balance of power.

But no other recent poll has been as positive for the Coalition. On average, the other polls show Labor leading the Coalition 52-48 after preferences.


Read more >>

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

On average, a beautiful set of numbers for Abbott


IF THE weekend's Age/Nielsen poll numbers are right, and the swing against Labor is uniform in all seats, then an election today would install Tony Abbott as prime minister.

More than that. On these figures, the Coalition would win all 15 seats in Western Australia. The Greens would win their first seat in the House of Representatives, unseating Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner in Melbourne.

He would not be the only senior minister thrown out. With Labor's support in the west down to just 25 per cent, Foreign Minister Stephen Smith would be turfed out in Perth.

Of course, it's just an opinion poll. And anyone who remembers opinion polls knows we've been here before. In 2001, and again in 2004, John Howard was trailing in the polls at this stage. He won the elections.

But then, he could spend his way out of trouble. Labor can't.

Nielsen pollster John Stirton cautions that a poll this size has a margin of error of up to 2.6 per cent. That could yield a wide range of outcomes. As Michelle Grattan wrote yesterday, on these numbers the election result is too close to call.

But this was not a rogue poll. Of five polls conducted in May, four have found the Coalition polling at least 50 per cent of the two-party vote. And Labor has more voters in very safe seats, so a 50-50 split of votes tends to mean the Coalition wins most of the seats and government.

Assume a uniform swing in each state and, on these figures, Labor would lose 18 of the 88 seats it notionally holds after the redistribution.

It would be left with just 70 seats of the 150 in the House of Representatives, while the Coalition would win 76, with three independents and one Green. Mr Abbott could govern with the narrowest of majorities.

Who are the voters deserting Labor? For a more reliable picture, we have aggregated numbers from the past two Nielsen polls, and compared them with the same polls a year ago.

The swing against Labor has been massive: 7 per cent on primary votes, and 4.5 per cent in two-party terms. But the swing to the Coalition on primary votes has been just 2 per cent, with the Greens picking up 3.5 per cent and independents and minor parties the other 1.5 per cent.

The polls show the anti-Labor swing is almost universal. Only the 18-24 age group is moving the other way. But it is stronger in the resources states than in the south-east, stronger among women than men, and stronger in the cities than in the rest of the country.

The swing has been most intense of all among the 25 to 39-year-olds, the age group whose aspirations to home ownership have been assaulted by soaring house prices and interest rates. A year ago, 59 per cent of them backed Labor after preferences. Now, only 52 per cent of them do.

Geographically, the biggest hit has been in WA, where Labor's primary vote, even averaged over two polls, has slumped to 30 per cent, down from 42.5 per cent a year ago. After preferences, it is down from 49 per cent to 43 per cent.

The swing in Queensland is almost as bad, down 5.5 per cent in a year, although a year ago, Queensland was Labor's strongest state.

In NSW the swing is 4.5 per cent, while in South Australia the damage has been minor. In Tasmania and the ACT, the numbers polled are too small to be reliable, but they look horrible for Labor.

In Victoria, Labor's primary vote has slumped 6.5 per cent in the past year. Most of that has gone to the Greens, cutting the two-party swing to 3 per cent. Even so, the Liberals would reclaim Deakin and Corangamite, while the Greens would take Melbourne.

The other surprise is that the gender gap is back. A year ago, men and women as groups voted the same, but in the past two polls, men have come down 52-48 for Labor while women have opted 51-49 for the Coalition.

Those who thought Tony Abbott was a turnoff for women were wrong.


WHERE LABOR IS LOSING

% CHANGE IN VOTE IN PAST YEAR



BY STATE

1ST PREFS 2-PARTY

NSW Down 8 Down 4.5

Victoria Down 6.5 Down 3

Queensland Down 8.5 Down 5.5

WA Down 12.5 Down 6

SA/NT Down 6 Down 1.5



BY SEX

Male Down 6.5 Down 3

Female Down 8 Down 6

SOURCE: AGE/NIELSEN POLLS, MARCH-MAY 2009 AND APRIL-MAY 2010


Read more >>